Mathematicians: Smarter than AI? Prove it.
The models shaping the future of AI are only as rigorous as the mathematicians behind them. Apply your expertise where it matters- and get paid to do it.
Stephen
As seen on
Work that impacts your future.
The largest language models in the world still fail at undergraduate-level mathematics. You're the feedback loop that fixes this — one proof at a time.
Three steps.
No overhead.
Apply & Qualify
Complete a math assessment. We evaluate your proof-writing, problem-solving, and ability to identify logical errors. No resume required.
Get Matched
Based on your assessment results, you're matched to projects in your areas of strength. Calculus, algebra, topology, number theory — you choose what fits.
Work & Get Paid
Complete tasks on your own schedule. Each task has clear specifications and a defined scope. Payment is per-task, processed weekly, starting at $40/hour.
What you'll actually do.
Write a prompt
Craft precise mathematical prompts designed to probe the boundaries of model reasoning — non-trivial problems that expose structural weaknesses and explore edge cases.
Review AI output
Evaluate model-generated solutions line by line. Identify logical gaps, missed edge cases, and incorrect theorem applications.
Write the correct solution
Author a complete, rigorous solution that demonstrates the correct reasoning path. This becomes training signal.
Where models need you most.
These are the areas where current AI systems consistently struggle. Your expertise directly addresses the hardest open problems in mathematical reasoning.
Proof-Based Reasoning
Evaluate and construct formal proofs. Identify logical gaps, invalid inferences, and incomplete case analysis in model- generated arguments.
Multi-Step Problem Solving
Review complex solutions requiring sequential reasoning. Check that each step follows validly from the last and that no intermediate steps are skipped.
Symbolic Logic & Formalization
Assess the model's ability to translate natural language into formal mathematical notation and reason within formal systems.
Edge Cases & Counterexamples
Identify where models fail on boundary conditions, degenerate cases, and subtle counterexamples that break general claims.
Quantitative Modeling
Evaluate applied mathematics problems involving optimization, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling of real-world systems.
A selective community of experts
Work alongside writers, lawyers, health professionals, coders, professors, and bilingual experts shaping the future of AI.
.webp)
The problems here actually require engineering judgment. It's some of the most rigorous work I've done outside of a staff role.
Marcus
Software Engineer
.svg)
.webp)
The variety is what I didn't expect. One week I'm rewriting technical explanations, the next I'm evaluating how a model handles tone and voice.
Julia
Senior Copywriter
.webp)
Clinical nuance matters in this work. It's rare to find contract work where my specialty actually gets used properly.
Melissa
Clinical Reviewer
.webp)
The evaluation work here is more rigorous than most PM research I've run in-house. I've genuinely changed how I think about product quality.
Azhar
Senior Product Manager
.webp)
Legal reasoning in AI is still an unsolved problem. Getting to shape how these models handle it, from a practitioner's perspective, is the work I actually want to be doing.
Krysta
Solicitor
.webp)
The code review standards here are higher than most teams I've worked on. It's sharpened how I think about edge cases in my day job.
Tyler
Senior Engineer
.webp)
Pressure-testing these tools surfaces failure modes that matter. The work holds up to the standards I'd apply in practice.
Abi
Litigation Attorney
.webp){kind=logo}
.webp)
Most freelance work in my field is content mills. This is the first engagement where my clinical training is the reason I was hired, not an afterthought.
Liana
Clinical Researcher
.webp)
My writing background is exactly what this work needs. Evaluating how models handle narrative, voice, and subtext is surprisingly rigorous.
Mi Ji
Screenwriter
Paid to contributors
Expert annotators
Annotations completed
Built for people who think in proofs.
Graduate Students
PhD and Master's candidates in pure or applied mathematics.
Olympiad Competitors
National or international competition experience in creative problem solving.
Research Mathematicians
Active or former researchers applying deep expertise to AI reasoning.
Applied Math Professionals
Quants, engineers, and data scientists with rigorous math foundations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Have questions? Here we answer the most common questions.
You'll work on tasks that help AI perform better, like reviewing responses, checking accuracy, refining prompts, and rating outputs. No coding or technical background needed.
Projects vary but commonly include reviewing AI-generated text, ranking responses, checking facts, labeling data, and reviewing content in specific subject areas. All focused on improving real production AI systems.
This is ideal for people with strong reasoning skills, attention to detail, and subject-matter expertise who want flexible, remote work with real impact. Researchers, students, professionals, and independent contributors who enjoy analytical work and want to contribute to advancing AI systems.
This is a flexible, task-based contractor role. You work remotely on your own schedule, focused on output quality rather than hours logged. There is no long-term commitment required, and you can work as much or as little as you choose.
Get ahead in a changing workforce.
No recruiters. No interviews. Just meaningful work and real compensation.